Original Research

Barriers to reading in higher education: Rethinking reading support

Kristien Andrianatos
Reading & Writing | Vol 10, No 1 | a241 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v10i1.241 | © 2019 Kristien Andrianatos | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 15 April 2019 | Published: 30 September 2019

About the author(s)

Kristien Andrianatos, Centre for Academic and Professional Language Practice, School of Languages, Faculty of Humanities, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Reading is a functional academic literacy ability needed by students in higher education. In the South African context, inadequate reading ability is one of the reasons for high undergraduate attrition rates. It seems that role players within this sector are of the opinion that students have reading ‘problems’ that need to be ‘fixed’, often by generic reading courses. This article differs from the perception of reading ‘problems’, as reading is viewed from a lifespan developmental perspective. According to this perspective undergraduate students do not have reading ‘problems’ but experience reading barriers hindering their reading development and in effect their academic literacy.

Objectives: This study aimed to uncover some of these barriers by means of an empirical study conducted at the North-West University (NWU).

Method: The setting of this study was the Potchefstroom campus of the NWU. A qualitative methodology was chosen whereby 14 individual interviews and 7 focus group interviews were used. The purpose of these interviews was to better understand lecturers’ and students’ perceptions about the variables of the reading process, namely the reading ability of the reader, the text to be read, the task, and the socio-cultural context.

Results: Lecturers and students perceived a number of reading barriers within each variable, namely students’ non-compliance and lack of abilities, elements of the textbook and availability of lecturer notes, the format of the task, throughput pressures, and lecturers’ assumptions.

Conclusion: Knowledge of these barriers and knowledge of the interconnectedness of the reading process could enable role players to collaboratively rethink undergraduate reading support, in which the lecturer has a crucial role to play.


Keywords

Academic literacy; higher education; undergraduate students; reading; reading comprehension; reading development; reading barriers; tasks; textbooks; socio-cultural context; lecturers.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 7423
Total article views: 9526

 

Crossref Citations

1. Bridging the Printed or Digital Controversy: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Digital and Print Resources on College Students’ Reading Comprehension
Cristina de-la-Peña, Beatriz Chaves-Yuste, María Jesús Luque-Rojas
Journal of College Reading and Learning  vol: 54  issue: 2  first page: 79  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1080/10790195.2024.2350949

2. Using a reading comprehension heuristic to plan a mixed-methods research design
Kristien Andrianatos
Reading & Writing  vol: 16  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.4102/RW.v16i1.588

3. Reading skills and perceived challenges among high school learners in Carranglan, Nueva Ecija: A basis for developing gender-based instructional materials
Suzette D. C. Domingo
International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES  vol: 12  issue: 6  first page: 56  year: 2025  
doi: 10.21833/ijaas.2025.06.006

4. EXPLORING THE ROLE OF READING IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF WRITING ABILITIES
Ankit Solanki, Virali Patoliya
ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts  vol: 5  issue: 7  year: 2024  
doi: 10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.5063

5. Percepción y comportamiento lector: una investigación de mercadotecnia social con estudiantes de educación básica
Marco Villarroel Puma, María José Mendoza Cedeño, Tony Valentín Figueroa Mendoza
Ciencia Digital  vol: 9  issue: 3.1  first page: 6  year: 2025  
doi: 10.33262/cienciadigital.v9i3.1.3381

6. Eye-tracking contribution on processing of (implicit) reading comprehension
Cristina de-la-Peña
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research  vol: 13  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s44322-024-00013-w

7. What motivates undergraduate students to read beyond their lecture notes?
Selina Mkimbili, Jaquiline Amani, John Kalolo, Philpo John
Studies in Higher Education  vol: 51  issue: 1  first page: 88  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1080/03075079.2025.2456603

8. Examining how undergraduate students view reading and its significance
Madoda P. Cekiso
Reading & Writing  vol: 16  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.4102/RW.v16i1.593

9. Exploring factors influencing academic literacy – A data-driven perspective
Janus Roestenburg, Cornelius J. Kruger, Mariska Nel, Zander Janse van Rensburg
South African Journal of Information Management  vol: 26  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1729

10. Is it possible to promote executive functions in university students? Evidence of effectiveness of the πFEx-Academics
Natália Martins Dias, Bruna Martins Ávila, David Mesquita da Costa, Caroline Oliveira Cardoso, Rochele Paz Fonseca
Applied Neuropsychology: Adult  vol: 31  issue: 6  first page: 1116  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2109971

11. Academic reading as a grudging act: how do Higher Education students experience academic reading and what can educators do about it?
Will Mason, Meesha Warmington
Higher Education  vol: 88  issue: 3  first page: 839  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s10734-023-01145-2

12. Impact of Instructor Generated Guided Reading Questions for University Textbooks on Learning
Eric Martin, Steven Kim
Journal of College Reading and Learning  vol: 52  issue: 3  first page: 151  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1080/10790195.2022.2062489

13. Evaluación de la comprensión lectora en alumnos universitarios mexicanos de matemáticas aplicadas y computación
Jorge Guerra-García, Zaira Itzel Díaz-Rubio, Carmen Yolanda Guevara-Benítez, Alejandra Corona-Guevara
Papeles  vol: 14  issue: 28  year: 2022  
doi: 10.54104/papeles.v14n28.1271